Cut roses are one of the most important flowers in the ornamental plant industry that are widely cultivated all over the world. Longevity and postharvest quality is the most important characteristic in evaluating the quality of cut flowers which is influenced by various pre and post-harvest factors. Light, as one of the environmental cues in the postharvest condition of cut flowers, can play an important role in its qualitative characteristics. To the best of our knowledge, no detailed study has been reported so far in this case. This study aimed to investigate the intensity of light required for preserving the quality of cut flowers during the postharvest handling. This experiment was carried out as factorial in a completely randomized design with three replications in a postharvest room. The area was divided into three sections by optical shutters and the light intensity levels were applied in each section. Treatments were designed at three levels of light intensity of 15, 25 and 50 µmol m-2 s-1 emitting by LED lighting bulbs. The studied traits were vase life, activity of catalase and peroxidase enzymes, proline, relative fresh weight, anthocyanin, carotenoid and chlorophyll content. Results showed that the highest activity of catalase and peroxidase enzymes were at light intensity of 15 and 50 µmol m-2 s-1, respectively, and their activity decreased significantly during the vase life. The proline content increased with time and the highest level was observed in all three treatments on day 9 after harvest. The highest relative fresh weight was observed at light intensity of 15 µmol m-2 s-1 and in the vase life on the third day after harvest. The lowest relative fresh weight was also in the light intensity of 25 µmol m-2 s-1. In spite of these observations, however, there was no significant difference between the vase life, carotenoids, chlorophyll and anthocyanins of cut flowers at light intensities of 15, 25, and 50 µmol m-2 s-1. According to the results of this study, in order to improve the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of cut flowers during the post-harvest period, the light intensity of 15 µmol m-2 s-1 is recommended for flower shops industry.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject: Special Received: 2020/04/15 | Accepted: 2020/06/20 | Published: 2020/11/19
References
1. Arnon, A.N. (1967). Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal, 3, 112-121.
2. Bates, L., Waldren, R., Teare, I. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39, 205-207. [DOI:10.1007/BF00018060]
3. Bradford, M.M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248-254. [DOI:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3]
4. Bredmose, N., Nielsen, J. (2004). Effects of thermoperiodicity and plant population density on stem and flower elongation, leaf development, and specific fresh weight in single stemmed Rose (Rosa hybrida L.) Plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 100(1-4), 169-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2003.08.019]
5. Chakmak, I., Horst, W.J. (1991). Effect of aluminium on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean (Glycine max). Physiologia Plantarum, 83, 463-468. [DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb00121.x]
6. Daneshi Nergi M.A., Ahmadi, N. (2014). Effect of 1-MCP and ethylene on postharvest quality and expression of senescence-associated genes in cut rose cv. Sparkle. Scientia Horticulturae, 166, 78-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2013.12.015]
7. Fanourakis, D., Pieruschka, R., Savvides, A., Macnish, J.A., Sarlikioti, V., Woltering, J.E. (2013). Sources of vase life variation in cut roses: A review. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 78,1-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.12.001]
8. Grene, R. (2002). Oxidative stress and acclimation mechanisms in plants. The Arabidopsis Book/American Society of Plant Biologists. [DOI:10.1199/tab.0036.1]
9. He, Sh., C.E., Joyce, Irving, D., Faragher, J. (2006). Stem end blockage in cut Grevillea 'Crimson Yul-Lo' inflorescences. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 41(1),78-84. [DOI:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.03.002]
10. Hongbo, S., Zongsuo, L., Mingan, S., Shimeng, S., Zanmin, H. (2005). Investigation on dynamic changes of photosynthetic characteristics of 10 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes during two vegetative-growth stages at water deficits. Colloids and surfaces. Biointerface, 43, 221-227. [DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.05.005]
11. In, B.Ch., Lim, J.H. (2017). Potential vase life of cut Roses: seasonal variation and relationships with growth conditions, phenotypes, and gene expressions. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 135,93-103. [DOI:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.09.006]
12. Kuiper, D., van Reenen, H., and Ribot, S. (1996). Characterisation of flower bud opening in roses; A comparison of Madelon and Sonia roses. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 9(1),75-86. [DOI:10.1016/0925-5214(96)00026-9]
13. Kumar, N., Pal, M., Singh, A., Raj Kumar, S., Girish Chand, S. (2010). Exogenous proline alleviates oxidative stress and increase vase life in rose (Rosa hybrida L. 'Grand Gala'). Scientia Horticulturae, 127(1), 79-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.009]
14. Lynch, D., Sridhara, S., Thompson, J. (1985). Lipoxygenase-generated hydroperoxides account for the nonphysiological features of ethylene formation from 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid by microsomal membranes of carnations. Planta, 164, 121-125. [DOI:10.1007/BF00391036]
15. Mori, T., Sakurai, M., Shigeta, J., Yoshida, K., Kondo, T. (1993). Formation of anthocyanins from cells cultured from different parts of strawberry plants. Food Science, 58, 788-792. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb09359.x]
16. Rasouli, O., Ahmadi, N., Behmanesh, M. and Daneshi Nergi, M.A. (2015). Effects of BA and TDZ on postharvest quality and expression of laccase and aquaporin genes in cut Rose 'Sparkle. South African Journal of Botany, 99, 75-79. [DOI:10.1016/j.sajb.2015.03.191]
17. Sahebjamei, H., Abdolmaleki, P. and Ghanati, F. (2007). Effects of magnetic field on the antioxidant enzyme activities of suspension‐cultured tobacco cells. Bioelectromagnetics, 28, 42-47. [DOI:10.1002/bem.20262]
18. Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2003). The cut flower: Postharvest Considerations. Biological Science, 3(4), 406-42. [DOI:10.3923/jbs.2003.406.442]
19. Urban, L., Six, S., Barthelemy, L., Bearez, Ph. (2002). Effect of elevated co2 on leaf water relations , Water balance and senescence of cut roses. Journal of Plant Physiology, 723, 717-23. [DOI:10.1078/0176-1617-0602]
20. Zhang, J., Kirkham, M. (1996). Enzymatic responses of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle to drought in sorghum and sunflower plants. Plant Science, 113, 139-147. [DOI:10.1016/0168-9452(95)04295-4]
21. Zieslin, N., Mor, Y. (1990). Light on roses. A review. Scientia Horticulturae, 43(1-2), 1-14. [DOI:10.1016/0304-4238(90)90031-9]
Fazli M, Ahmadi N, Babaei A. Improving the postharvest quality characteristics of cut rose (Rosa×hybrida L.) ‘Red Alert’ in response to light intensity. FOP 2020; 4 (2) :74-86 URL: http://flowerjournal.ir/article-1-163-en.html