[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Indexing and Abstracting::
Reviewers::
Publication Ethics::
Copyright and Licensing::
Fees and Charges::
Open Access Statement::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 4, Issue 1 (10-2019) ::
FOP 2019, 4(1): 1-12 Back to browse issues page
The conflict of landscape aesthetic preferences with sustainable green space in arid regions
Zahra Karimian *
Department of Ornamentals, Research Centers for Plant Sciences. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Iran.
Abstract:   (5120 Views)
One of the social and citizen demands increasing in developing countries, is the expansion and rehabilitation of urban green spaces. In this case, population growth and lack of sustainable water resources is one of important challenges facing the arid regions. Change in style and paradigm of landscape design in arid areas with regard to the priority of reducing water consumption, can lead to social discontent caused by xeriscaping and creation of low input green spaces. Rising visual demand in society towards green spaces in recent decades as a result of improper selection of landscape design patterns, especially in dry areas, is the main background for a possible conflict between aesthetic preferences and sustainable green space in this region. In xeriscaping, integration of effective factors in aesthetic perception with relevant variables in planting design less has been considered. Effective factors in aesthetic perception are nine visual concepts include coherence, disturbance, stewardship, imageability, visual scale, naturalness, historicity and ephemera. Seven fundamental principles of xeriscaping are plan and design for water conservation, improve the soil, limit turf area or select alternatives, irrigate efficiently, select appropriate plants and hydrozone plants, mulch to reduce evaporation, maintaining a xeriscape. Despite researches showing that xeriscaping could usually reduce landscape water consumption by one-third however, many people were initially reluctant to substitute it for conventional landscaping. A common perception was that xeriscape were drab and barren and featured nothing more than rocks and some succulent and cacti. In this paper, on the one hand the aesthetic preferences of landscape and green space and also options of design in arid regions of Iran have been explored and on the other hand, the reasons of possible confrontation between these two major issues and suitable strategies for reducing the conflict, has been discussed and analyzed. Among of nine concept of aesthetics that affect social preferences, the concepts of complexity, coherence, imageability and ephemera in green spaces of arid regions, are faced with more challenges than other concepts. Since in the xeriscaping, use of drought-resistant plants is one of the principles so, for low diversity in ornamental plant species and partial removal of lawns and water element in the landscape, aesthetic preferences of citizens, will not be fulfilled completely. Social awareness toward the water crisis in the arid and semi-arid regions of Iran, ornamental plant domestication and import of drought resistant species as alternatives and also creativity and innovation in designing of xeriscaping, can decrease the possible dissatisfaction of the citizens from the sustainable and rational development of green spaces in dry climates.
Keywords: Aesthetic landscape, Green space Management, Xeriscaping
Full-Text [PDF 2070 kb]   (1070 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/11/29 | Accepted: 2019/11/29 | Published: 2019/11/29
References
1. Appleton, J. (1975). The Experience of Landscapes. Chichester: Wiley.
2. Bell, S. (1999). Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process. London: Spon Press.
3. Bourassa Steven, C. (1990). A Paradigm for Landscape Aesthetics. Environment and behavior, 22(6), 787-812. [DOI:10.1177/0013916590226004]
4. Brewer Stern, D. (2010). The role of public gardens in promoting water-wise landscaping. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Delaware.
5. Cooke, P. (2012). Green design aesthetics: Ten principles. City, Culture and Society 3, 293-302. [DOI:10.1016/j.ccs.2012.11.001]
6. Ellefson, C.L., Winger, D. (2004). Xeriscape Colorado: The Complete Guide. Westcliffe Press.
7. Fairclough, G., Lambrick, G., McNab, A. (1999) Yesterday's World, Tomorrow's Landscape. The English Heritage Historic Landscape Project 1992-94 (London: English Heritage).
8. Gobster, P.H., Nassauer, J.I., Daniel, T.C., Fry, G. (2007). The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology, 22, 959-972. [DOI:10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x]
9. Hoyer, J., Dickhaut, W., Kronawitter, L., Weber, B. (2011). Water Sensitive Urban Design Principles and Inspiration for Sustainable tormwater Management in the City of the Future. jovis Verlag GmbH, Kurfürstenstraße Press, Germany.
10. Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skřivanová, Z., Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in Landscape Preference Judgments: The Effects of Landscape Visual Aestheticquality and Respondents' Characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 36-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009]
11. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kaplan, S., Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. New York: Praeger.
13. Karimian, Z. (2015). Green roof and the challenges of its construction and establishment in arid regions of Iran. The First National Conference On Low Water Green Space, 107. In Persian
14. Kellert, S.R., Wilson, E.O. (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis (Washington, DC: Island Press/Shearwater Books). Landscapes, Geographical Essay, 103-128.
15. Khosroushahi, M. (2012). The compare of geomorphoclimatological deserts domain of Iran. Watershed Management Researches (Pajouhesh-Va-Sazandegi), 94, 10-18. In Persian
16. Litton, R.B. (1972). Aesthetic Dimensions of the Landscape, in: J. V. Krutilla (Ed.) Natural Environments: Studies in Theoretical and Applied Analysis, 262-291 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
17. Lothian, A. (1999). Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning, 44, 177-198. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5]
18. Lowenthal, D. (1979). Age and Artefact, in: D. W. Meining (Ed.) The Interpretation of Ordinary.
19. Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
20. Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press & Harvard University Press).
21. Nassauer, J.I. (1995). Messy ecosystems, orderly frames, Landscape Journal, 1, 161 - 170. [DOI:10.3368/lj.14.2.161]
22. Nohl, W. (2001). Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception-preliminary reflections on futurelandscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4), 223-237. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00138-4]
23. Ode, A., Tveit, M.S., Fry, G. (2008). Capturing Landscape Visual Character Using Indicators: Touching Base with Landscape Aesthetic Theory. Landscape Research, 33(1), 89-117. [DOI:10.1080/01426390701773854]
24. Sevenant, M., Antrop, M. (2010). The Use of Latent Classes to Identify Individual Differences in the Importance of Landscape Dimensions for Aesthetic Preference. Land Use Policy, 27(3), 827-842. [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.11.002]
25. Ulrich, R.S. (1979). Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape Research, 4, 14-23. [DOI:10.1080/01426397908705892]
26. Ulrich, R.S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-421. [DOI:10.1126/science.6143402]
27. Walter, V.R., Harold Alfred, M. (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC., USA.
28. Wang, M., Yu, B. (2012). Landscape Characteristic Aesthetic Structure: Construction of Urban Landscapecharacteristic Time-Spatial Pattern Based on Aesthetic Subjects. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 1(3), 305-315. [DOI:10.1016/j.foar.2012.07.001]
29. Zhang, B. (2013). The Aesthetic Attributes of Green Infrastructure - A Study of the Perceptions of Beauty, Ecological Significance, and Naturalness for a Stormwater Treatment Area by Three College Populations with Different Educational Backgrounds. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, 1-164.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Karimian Z. The conflict of landscape aesthetic preferences with sustainable green space in arid regions. FOP 2019; 4 (1) :1-12
URL: http://flowerjournal.ir/article-1-146-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 4, Issue 1 (10-2019) Back to browse issues page
گل و گیاهان زینتی Flower and Ornamental Plants
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660