:: دوره 7، شماره 1 - ( بهار و تابستان 1401 ) ::
جلد 7 شماره 1 صفحات 118-93 برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
ارزیابی ویژگی‌های زیباشناختی درختچه‌های زینتی گل‌دار در فضای سبز شهری (بررسی موردی: منطقه یک شهر رشت)
مجید شعبان‌زاده خسادی ، معظم حسن‌پور اصیل* ، وحید شادپرور
دانشگاه گیلان
چکیده:   (1366 مشاهده)
درختچه‌های زینتی گلدار در فضای سبز شهری از اهمیت ویژه‌ای برخوردار هستند. انتخاب مناسب این گیاهان با توجه به معیارهای اکولوژیک و زیبایی شناسی آنها می‌تواند به بهبود و گسترش عملکرد فضای سبز شهری کمک شایانی کند. پژوهش‌‌های فراوانی در رابطه با نحوه انتخاب گیاهان در فضای سبز انجام شده است اما پژوهش‌‌هایی که به‌‌طور ویژه ویژگی‌‌های زیباشناختی درختچه‌های زینتی گلدار را ارزیابی کند، کمتر دیده شده است. این پژوهش به شناسایی و اولویت‌‌بندی درختچه‌های زینتی گل‌‌دار در فضای سبز شهری منطقه یک رشت از نظر کارشناسان می‌پردازد. روش به‌‌کارگرفته شده در این پژوهش، رویکرد ترکیبی ای اچ پی‌‌تاپسیس می‌باشد که برای اولویت‌‌بندی شاخص‌‌ها از روش ای اچ پی و رتبه‌‌بندی درختچه‌ها از روش تاپسیس بهره گرفته شد. نتایج این پژوهش با توجه به شناسایی 10 شاخص و 17 درختچه، نشان داد که در بین شاخص‌ها، زیبایی منظر با ضریب 188/0 و طول دوره گلدهی با ضریب 185/0، رتبه‌های اول و دوم را به خود اختصاص دادند. همچنین، شاخص ارتفاع درختچه و شاخه‌بندی با وزن‌های 047/0 و 059/0، رتبه‌های آخر را به‌‌دست آوردند. در بین درختچه‌ها نیز درختچه توری با ضریب 791/0 رتبه اول و درختچه‌های شیشه شور و خرزهره به‌‌ترتیب با ضریب‌های 732/0 و 722/0، رتبه‌های دوم و سوم درختچه‌های برتر را در سطح فضای سبز منطقه یک شهر رشت از نگاه کارشناسان به‌‌دست آوردند و درختچه‌های نرگس درختی و طاووسی با ضریب‌های 321/0 و 309/0 رتبه‌‌‌های آخر را به‌‌خود اختصاص دادند. با توجه به روش به‌‌کار گرفته شده، می‌توان انتخاب گیاهان را به‌‌صورت ترکیبی ای اچ پی‌‌تاپسیس در اولویت قرار داد و در اقلیم‌های مشابه نیز به‌‌کار برد.
واژه‌های کلیدی: شاخص زیبا شناسی، زیبایی منظر، فضای سبز، ای اچ پی‌‌تاپسیس
متن کامل [PDF 2259 kb]   (216 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: تخصصي
دریافت: 1400/10/16 | پذیرش: 1401/2/2 | انتشار: 1401/7/23
فهرست منابع
1. Aalbers, C. B. E. M., Sehested, K. (2018). Critical upscaling. how citizens initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 29, 261-275. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.005]
3. Abbasi, Q. Azadbakht, M. Tajur, Y Akbarzadeh, M. (2014). Aesthetic evaluation of hyrcanian native tree plants (Case study: Sari city area). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 49(2), 515-527 (in Persian).
4. Alizadeh, B., Hitchmough, J. (2019). Areview of urban landscape adaptation to the challenge of climate change. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(2), 178-194. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179. [DOI:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179]
5. Aşur, F. (2019). Ornamental plants which can be used in visual landscape improvement in cold climate regions. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, 14(4), 152-159.
6. Chen, L., Wang, Y. (2020). Study on plant configuration and planning of landscape architecture in coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(SI), 17-20. doi:10.2112/jcr-si115-006.1. [DOI:10.2112/JCR-SI115-006.1]
7. Chenhui, X. (2020). Application of plant configuration method in modern landscape under the background of digital technology. paper presented at the 2020 International conference on Innovation design and digital technology (ICIDDT). Zhenjing, China. [DOI:10.1109/ICIDDT52279.2020.00076]
8. Darkhani, F., Tahir, O. Mohd, Ibrahim, R. (2019). Sustainable urban landscape management: an insight into urban green space management practices in three different countries. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 12, 37-48. doi: 10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003. [DOI:10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003]
9. Deniz, B. Şirin, U. (2010). A study of ecological integrity based on native plants in kuşadasi (turkey) urban area and surrounding natural environment. Scientific research and essays 5, 1820-18. doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000111.
10. Gleason, K. L. (2019). The lost dimension: pruned plants in roman gardens. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 28(3), 311-325. doi:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2. [DOI:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2]
11. Goodness, J. (2018). Urban landscaping choices and people's selection of plant traits in cape town, south africa. Environmental Science & Policy, 85, 182-192. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.010]
13. Harp, D., Chretien, K., Brown, M., Jones, C., Lopez-Serrano, J. (2021). Landscape performance of ebony crepe myrtle cultivars in low-input landscapes in northcentral Texas. HortTechnology, 31(2), 234-240. [DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH04748-20]
14. Hilbert, D.A., Koeser, A.K., Northrop, R.J. (2020). Urban tree selection for diversity. EDIS, 5, 589-2020. [DOI:10.32473/edis-ep589-2020]
15. Hoyle, H., Norton, B., Dunnett, N., Richards, J. P., Russell, J. M., Warren, P. (2018). Plant species or flower colour diversity? identifying the drivers of public and invertebrate response to designed annual meadows. Landscape and urban planning, 180, 103-113. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.017]
17. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. in C.-L. Hwang & K. Yoon (Eds.), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey (pp. 58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
18. Ignatieva, M. (2021). Evolution of the Approaches to Planting Design of Parks and Gardens as Main Greenspaces of Green Infrastructure. In C. Catalano, M. B. Andreucci, R. Guarino, F. Bretzel, M. Leone, & S. Pasta (Eds.), Urban Services to Ecosystems: Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale (pp. 435-452). Cham: springer international publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_23]
19. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Ward Thompson, C. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 65-75. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001]
21. Jansson, M., Vogel, N., Fors, H., Randrup, T. B. (2019). The governance of landscape management new approaches to urban open space development. Landscape Research, 44(8), 952-965. doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199]
22. Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skřivanová, Z., Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents' characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 36-44. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009]
24. Kendal, D., Williams, K. J. H., Williams, N. S. G. (2012). Plant traits link people's plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1), 34-42. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023]
26. Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Hansen, G., Clem, T. (2020). Landscape aesthetics and maintenance perceptions: assessing the relationship between homeowners' visual attention and landscape care knowledge. Land Use Policy, 95, 104645. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104645]
28. Li, Z. (2020). Modularization of landscape architecture based on computer aided design involvement in aesthetics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574, 012089. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089]
29. Liu, M., Schroth, O. (2019). Assessment of Aesthetic preferences in relation to vegetation-created enclosure in Chinese urban parks: a case study of Shenzhen Litchi Park. Sustainability, 11(6). doi:10.3390/su11061809. [DOI:10.3390/su11061809]
30. Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J. V., Cormier, L., Madureira, T. (2015). Urban residents' beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 56-64. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008]
32. Majewska, A. A., Altizer, S. (2020). Planting gardens to support insect pollinators. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 15-25. doi: [DOI:10.1111/cobi.13271]
34. Mousadegh, A. A., Mahdavi, S. K., Mahmoudi, J. (2018). Using native species in urban landscape: Kordkuy city of Golestan province (a case study). Flower and Ornamental Plants, 2(2), 48-61 (in Persian).
35. Naroei, B., Yal, M. (2021). Evaluation of visual and aesthetic preferences of landscape in urban parks based on public preferences (A Case study of Sayad-e-Shirazi Park in Birjand). Human & Environment, 19(2), 201-219.
36. Nazemi Rafi, Z., Kazemi, F., Tehranifar, A. (2020). Public preferences toward water-wise landscape design in a summer season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126563. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126563]
38. Pan, X., Lin, Q. (2020). Simulation and optimization of the scenic beauty of green plants in the landscape design. Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics, Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15235-2_43]
39. Reis, C., Lopes, A. (2019). Evaluating the cooling potential of urban green spaces to tackle urban climate change in Lisbon. Sustainability, 11(9), 2480. doi:10.3390/su11092480. [DOI:10.3390/su11092480]
40. Riechers, M., Strack, M., Barkmann, J., Tscharntke, T. (2019). Cultural Ecosystem services provided by urban green change along an urban-periurban gradient. Sustainability, 11(3), 645. doi:10.3390/su11030645. [DOI:10.3390/su11030645]
41. Saaty, T. L. (1984). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments. in R. Avenhaus and R. K. Huber (eds.), Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control: Mathematical Modeling and Simulation in the Analysis of Arms Control Problems (pp. 285-308). Boston, MA: Springer us. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12]
42. Sedghiyan, D., Ashouri, A., Maftouni, N., Xiong, Q., Rezaee, E., Sadeghi, S. (2021). Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44, 101045. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101045]
44. Tabassum, S., Ossola, A., Manea, A., Cinantya, A., Fernandez Winzer, L., Leishman, M. R. (2020). Using ecological knowledge for landscaping with plants in cities. Ecological Engineering, 158, 106049. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106049]
46. Wang, B., Xie, H.-L., Ren, H.-Y., Li, X., Chen, L., Wu, B.-C. (2019). Application of AHP, TOPSIS, and TFNs to plant selection for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils in shale gas and oil fields. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 13-22. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.301]
48. Wang, L., Ali, Y., Nazir, S., Niazi, M. (2020). ISA Evaluation framework for security of Internet of health things system using AHP-TOPSIS methods. IEEE Access, 8, 152316-152332. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221]
49. Wang, R. (2021). Design of visual landscape garden environment of plant landscape based on CAD software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1992(2), 022159. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159]
50. Wang, R., Zhao, J. (2020). Effects of evergreen trees on landscape preference and perceived restorativeness across seasons. Landscape Research, 45(5), 649-661. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507]
51. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 6-13. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005]
53. Watson, A. S., Bai, R. S. (2021). Phytoremediation for urban landscaping and air pollution control- a case study in Trivandrum city, Kerala, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9979-9990. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1]
54. Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., Hu, B. (2018). Design intensities in relation to visual aesthetic preference. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 305-310. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.011]
56. Zare Zadeh, F., Karimian, A., Soudaie Zadeh, H. (2017). Effect of salt stress on some physiological attributes of Nerium oleander. Water and Soil Science, 27(3), 41-51.
57. Zhuang, J., Qiao, L., Zhang, X., Su, Y., Xia, Y. (2021). Effects of visual attributes of flower borders in urban vegetation landscapes on aesthetic preference and emotional perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9318. MDPI AG. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179318. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179318]
58. Aalbers, C. B. E. M., Sehested, K. (2018). Critical upscaling. how citizens initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 29, 261-275. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.005]
60. Abbasi, Q. Azadbakht, M. Tajur, Y Akbarzadeh, M. (2014). Aesthetic evaluation of hyrcanian native tree plants (Case study: Sari city area). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 49(2), 515-527 (in Persian).
61. Alizadeh, B., Hitchmough, J. (2019). Areview of urban landscape adaptation to the challenge of climate change. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(2), 178-194. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179. [DOI:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179]
62. Aşur, F. (2019). Ornamental plants which can be used in visual landscape improvement in cold climate regions. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, 14(4), 152-159.
63. Chen, L., Wang, Y. (2020). Study on plant configuration and planning of landscape architecture in coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(SI), 17-20. doi:10.2112/jcr-si115-006.1. [DOI:10.2112/JCR-SI115-006.1]
64. Chenhui, X. (2020). Application of plant configuration method in modern landscape under the background of digital technology. paper presented at the 2020 International conference on Innovation design and digital technology (ICIDDT). Zhenjing, China. [DOI:10.1109/ICIDDT52279.2020.00076]
65. Darkhani, F., Tahir, O. Mohd, Ibrahim, R. (2019). Sustainable urban landscape management: an insight into urban green space management practices in three different countries. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 12, 37-48. doi: 10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003. [DOI:10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003]
66. Deniz, B. Şirin, U. (2010). A study of ecological integrity based on native plants in kuşadasi (turkey) urban area and surrounding natural environment. Scientific research and essays 5, 1820-18. doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000111.
67. Gleason, K. L. (2019). The lost dimension: pruned plants in roman gardens. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 28(3), 311-325. doi:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2. [DOI:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2]
68. Goodness, J. (2018). Urban landscaping choices and people's selection of plant traits in cape town, south africa. Environmental Science & Policy, 85, 182-192. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.010]
70. Harp, D., Chretien, K., Brown, M., Jones, C., Lopez-Serrano, J. (2021). Landscape performance of ebony crepe myrtle cultivars in low-input landscapes in northcentral Texas. HortTechnology, 31(2), 234-240. [DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH04748-20]
71. Hilbert, D.A., Koeser, A.K., Northrop, R.J. (2020). Urban tree selection for diversity. EDIS, 5, 589-2020. [DOI:10.32473/edis-ep589-2020]
72. Hoyle, H., Norton, B., Dunnett, N., Richards, J. P., Russell, J. M., Warren, P. (2018). Plant species or flower colour diversity? identifying the drivers of public and invertebrate response to designed annual meadows. Landscape and urban planning, 180, 103-113. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.017]
74. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. in C.-L. Hwang & K. Yoon (Eds.), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey (pp. 58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
75. Ignatieva, M. (2021). Evolution of the Approaches to Planting Design of Parks and Gardens as Main Greenspaces of Green Infrastructure. In C. Catalano, M. B. Andreucci, R. Guarino, F. Bretzel, M. Leone, & S. Pasta (Eds.), Urban Services to Ecosystems: Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale (pp. 435-452). Cham: springer international publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_23]
76. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Ward Thompson, C. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 65-75. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001]
78. Jansson, M., Vogel, N., Fors, H., Randrup, T. B. (2019). The governance of landscape management new approaches to urban open space development. Landscape Research, 44(8), 952-965. doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199]
79. Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skřivanová, Z., Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents' characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 36-44. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009]
81. Kendal, D., Williams, K. J. H., Williams, N. S. G. (2012). Plant traits link people's plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1), 34-42. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023]
83. Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Hansen, G., Clem, T. (2020). Landscape aesthetics and maintenance perceptions: assessing the relationship between homeowners' visual attention and landscape care knowledge. Land Use Policy, 95, 104645. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104645]
85. Li, Z. (2020). Modularization of landscape architecture based on computer aided design involvement in aesthetics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574, 012089. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089]
86. Liu, M., Schroth, O. (2019). Assessment of Aesthetic preferences in relation to vegetation-created enclosure in Chinese urban parks: a case study of Shenzhen Litchi Park. Sustainability, 11(6). doi:10.3390/su11061809. [DOI:10.3390/su11061809]
87. Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J. V., Cormier, L., Madureira, T. (2015). Urban residents' beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 56-64. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008]
89. Majewska, A. A., Altizer, S. (2020). Planting gardens to support insect pollinators. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 15-25. doi: [DOI:10.1111/cobi.13271]
91. Mousadegh, A. A., Mahdavi, S. K., Mahmoudi, J. (2018). Using native species in urban landscape: Kordkuy city of Golestan province (a case study). Flower and Ornamental Plants, 2(2), 48-61 (in Persian).
92. Naroei, B., Yal, M. (2021). Evaluation of visual and aesthetic preferences of landscape in urban parks based on public preferences (A Case study of Sayad-e-Shirazi Park in Birjand). Human & Environment, 19(2), 201-219.
93. Nazemi Rafi, Z., Kazemi, F., Tehranifar, A. (2020). Public preferences toward water-wise landscape design in a summer season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126563. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126563]
95. Pan, X., Lin, Q. (2020). Simulation and optimization of the scenic beauty of green plants in the landscape design. Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics, Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15235-2_43]
96. Reis, C., Lopes, A. (2019). Evaluating the cooling potential of urban green spaces to tackle urban climate change in Lisbon. Sustainability, 11(9), 2480. doi:10.3390/su11092480. [DOI:10.3390/su11092480]
97. Riechers, M., Strack, M., Barkmann, J., Tscharntke, T. (2019). Cultural Ecosystem services provided by urban green change along an urban-periurban gradient. Sustainability, 11(3), 645. doi:10.3390/su11030645. [DOI:10.3390/su11030645]
98. Saaty, T. L. (1984). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments. in R. Avenhaus and R. K. Huber (eds.), Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control: Mathematical Modeling and Simulation in the Analysis of Arms Control Problems (pp. 285-308). Boston, MA: Springer us. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12]
99. Sedghiyan, D., Ashouri, A., Maftouni, N., Xiong, Q., Rezaee, E., Sadeghi, S. (2021). Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44, 101045. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101045]
101. Tabassum, S., Ossola, A., Manea, A., Cinantya, A., Fernandez Winzer, L., Leishman, M. R. (2020). Using ecological knowledge for landscaping with plants in cities. Ecological Engineering, 158, 106049. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106049]
103. Wang, B., Xie, H.-L., Ren, H.-Y., Li, X., Chen, L., Wu, B.-C. (2019). Application of AHP, TOPSIS, and TFNs to plant selection for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils in shale gas and oil fields. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 13-22. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.301]
105. Wang, L., Ali, Y., Nazir, S., Niazi, M. (2020). ISA Evaluation framework for security of Internet of health things system using AHP-TOPSIS methods. IEEE Access, 8, 152316-152332. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221]
106. Wang, R. (2021). Design of visual landscape garden environment of plant landscape based on CAD software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1992(2), 022159. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159]
107. Wang, R., Zhao, J. (2020). Effects of evergreen trees on landscape preference and perceived restorativeness across seasons. Landscape Research, 45(5), 649-661. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507]
108. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 6-13. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005]
110. Watson, A. S., Bai, R. S. (2021). Phytoremediation for urban landscaping and air pollution control- a case study in Trivandrum city, Kerala, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9979-9990. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1]
111. Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., Hu, B. (2018). Design intensities in relation to visual aesthetic preference. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 305-310. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.011]
113. Zare Zadeh, F., Karimian, A., Soudaie Zadeh, H. (2017). Effect of salt stress on some physiological attributes of Nerium oleander. Water and Soil Science, 27(3), 41-51.
114. Zhuang, J., Qiao, L., Zhang, X., Su, Y., Xia, Y. (2021). Effects of visual attributes of flower borders in urban vegetation landscapes on aesthetic preference and emotional perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9318. MDPI AG. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179318. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179318]
115. Aalbers, C. B. E. M., Sehested, K. (2018). Critical upscaling. how citizens initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 29, 261-275. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.005]
117. Abbasi, Q. Azadbakht, M. Tajur, Y Akbarzadeh, M. (2014). Aesthetic evaluation of hyrcanian native tree plants (Case study: Sari city area). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 49(2), 515-527 (in Persian).
118. Alizadeh, B., Hitchmough, J. (2019). Areview of urban landscape adaptation to the challenge of climate change. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(2), 178-194. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179. [DOI:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179]
119. Aşur, F. (2019). Ornamental plants which can be used in visual landscape improvement in cold climate regions. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, 14(4), 152-159.
120. Chen, L., Wang, Y. (2020). Study on plant configuration and planning of landscape architecture in coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(SI), 17-20. doi:10.2112/jcr-si115-006.1. [DOI:10.2112/JCR-SI115-006.1]
121. Chenhui, X. (2020). Application of plant configuration method in modern landscape under the background of digital technology. paper presented at the 2020 International conference on Innovation design and digital technology (ICIDDT). Zhenjing, China. [DOI:10.1109/ICIDDT52279.2020.00076]
122. Darkhani, F., Tahir, O. Mohd, Ibrahim, R. (2019). Sustainable urban landscape management: an insight into urban green space management practices in three different countries. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 12, 37-48. doi: 10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003. [DOI:10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003]
123. Deniz, B. Şirin, U. (2010). A study of ecological integrity based on native plants in kuşadasi (turkey) urban area and surrounding natural environment. Scientific research and essays 5, 1820-18. doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000111.
124. Gleason, K. L. (2019). The lost dimension: pruned plants in roman gardens. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 28(3), 311-325. doi:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2. [DOI:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2]
125. Goodness, J. (2018). Urban landscaping choices and people's selection of plant traits in cape town, south africa. Environmental Science & Policy, 85, 182-192. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.010]
127. Harp, D., Chretien, K., Brown, M., Jones, C., Lopez-Serrano, J. (2021). Landscape performance of ebony crepe myrtle cultivars in low-input landscapes in northcentral Texas. HortTechnology, 31(2), 234-240. [DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH04748-20]
128. Hilbert, D.A., Koeser, A.K., Northrop, R.J. (2020). Urban tree selection for diversity. EDIS, 5, 589-2020. [DOI:10.32473/edis-ep589-2020]
129. Hoyle, H., Norton, B., Dunnett, N., Richards, J. P., Russell, J. M., Warren, P. (2018). Plant species or flower colour diversity? identifying the drivers of public and invertebrate response to designed annual meadows. Landscape and urban planning, 180, 103-113. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.017]
131. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. in C.-L. Hwang & K. Yoon (Eds.), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey (pp. 58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
132. Ignatieva, M. (2021). Evolution of the Approaches to Planting Design of Parks and Gardens as Main Greenspaces of Green Infrastructure. In C. Catalano, M. B. Andreucci, R. Guarino, F. Bretzel, M. Leone, & S. Pasta (Eds.), Urban Services to Ecosystems: Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale (pp. 435-452). Cham: springer international publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_23]
133. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Ward Thompson, C. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 65-75. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001]
135. Jansson, M., Vogel, N., Fors, H., Randrup, T. B. (2019). The governance of landscape management new approaches to urban open space development. Landscape Research, 44(8), 952-965. doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199]
136. Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skřivanová, Z., Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents' characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 36-44. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009]
138. Kendal, D., Williams, K. J. H., Williams, N. S. G. (2012). Plant traits link people's plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1), 34-42. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023]
140. Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Hansen, G., Clem, T. (2020). Landscape aesthetics and maintenance perceptions: assessing the relationship between homeowners' visual attention and landscape care knowledge. Land Use Policy, 95, 104645. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104645]
142. Li, Z. (2020). Modularization of landscape architecture based on computer aided design involvement in aesthetics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574, 012089. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089]
143. Liu, M., Schroth, O. (2019). Assessment of Aesthetic preferences in relation to vegetation-created enclosure in Chinese urban parks: a case study of Shenzhen Litchi Park. Sustainability, 11(6). doi:10.3390/su11061809. [DOI:10.3390/su11061809]
144. Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J. V., Cormier, L., Madureira, T. (2015). Urban residents' beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 56-64. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008]
146. Majewska, A. A., Altizer, S. (2020). Planting gardens to support insect pollinators. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 15-25. doi: [DOI:10.1111/cobi.13271]
148. Mousadegh, A. A., Mahdavi, S. K., Mahmoudi, J. (2018). Using native species in urban landscape: Kordkuy city of Golestan province (a case study). Flower and Ornamental Plants, 2(2), 48-61 (in Persian).
149. Naroei, B., Yal, M. (2021). Evaluation of visual and aesthetic preferences of landscape in urban parks based on public preferences (A Case study of Sayad-e-Shirazi Park in Birjand). Human & Environment, 19(2), 201-219.
150. Nazemi Rafi, Z., Kazemi, F., Tehranifar, A. (2020). Public preferences toward water-wise landscape design in a summer season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126563. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126563]
152. Pan, X., Lin, Q. (2020). Simulation and optimization of the scenic beauty of green plants in the landscape design. Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics, Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15235-2_43]
153. Reis, C., Lopes, A. (2019). Evaluating the cooling potential of urban green spaces to tackle urban climate change in Lisbon. Sustainability, 11(9), 2480. doi:10.3390/su11092480. [DOI:10.3390/su11092480]
154. Riechers, M., Strack, M., Barkmann, J., Tscharntke, T. (2019). Cultural Ecosystem services provided by urban green change along an urban-periurban gradient. Sustainability, 11(3), 645. doi:10.3390/su11030645. [DOI:10.3390/su11030645]
155. Saaty, T. L. (1984). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments. in R. Avenhaus and R. K. Huber (eds.), Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control: Mathematical Modeling and Simulation in the Analysis of Arms Control Problems (pp. 285-308). Boston, MA: Springer us. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12]
156. Sedghiyan, D., Ashouri, A., Maftouni, N., Xiong, Q., Rezaee, E., Sadeghi, S. (2021). Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44, 101045. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101045]
158. Tabassum, S., Ossola, A., Manea, A., Cinantya, A., Fernandez Winzer, L., Leishman, M. R. (2020). Using ecological knowledge for landscaping with plants in cities. Ecological Engineering, 158, 106049. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106049]
160. Wang, B., Xie, H.-L., Ren, H.-Y., Li, X., Chen, L., Wu, B.-C. (2019). Application of AHP, TOPSIS, and TFNs to plant selection for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils in shale gas and oil fields. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 13-22. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.301]
162. Wang, L., Ali, Y., Nazir, S., Niazi, M. (2020). ISA Evaluation framework for security of Internet of health things system using AHP-TOPSIS methods. IEEE Access, 8, 152316-152332. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221]
163. Wang, R. (2021). Design of visual landscape garden environment of plant landscape based on CAD software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1992(2), 022159. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159]
164. Wang, R., Zhao, J. (2020). Effects of evergreen trees on landscape preference and perceived restorativeness across seasons. Landscape Research, 45(5), 649-661. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507]
165. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 6-13. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005]
167. Watson, A. S., Bai, R. S. (2021). Phytoremediation for urban landscaping and air pollution control- a case study in Trivandrum city, Kerala, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9979-9990. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1]
168. Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., Hu, B. (2018). Design intensities in relation to visual aesthetic preference. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 305-310. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.011]
170. Zare Zadeh, F., Karimian, A., Soudaie Zadeh, H. (2017). Effect of salt stress on some physiological attributes of Nerium oleander. Water and Soil Science, 27(3), 41-51.
171. Zhuang, J., Qiao, L., Zhang, X., Su, Y., Xia, Y. (2021). Effects of visual attributes of flower borders in urban vegetation landscapes on aesthetic preference and emotional perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9318. MDPI AG. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179318. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179318]
172. Aalbers, C. B. E. M., Sehested, K. (2018). Critical upscaling. how citizens initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 29, 261-275. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.005]
174. Abbasi, Q. Azadbakht, M. Tajur, Y Akbarzadeh, M. (2014). Aesthetic evaluation of hyrcanian native tree plants (Case study: Sari city area). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 49(2), 515-527 (in Persian).
175. Alizadeh, B., Hitchmough, J. (2019). Areview of urban landscape adaptation to the challenge of climate change. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(2), 178-194. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179. [DOI:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179]
176. Aşur, F. (2019). Ornamental plants which can be used in visual landscape improvement in cold climate regions. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, 14(4), 152-159.
177. Chen, L., Wang, Y. (2020). Study on plant configuration and planning of landscape architecture in coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(SI), 17-20. doi:10.2112/jcr-si115-006.1. [DOI:10.2112/JCR-SI115-006.1]
178. Chenhui, X. (2020). Application of plant configuration method in modern landscape under the background of digital technology. paper presented at the 2020 International conference on Innovation design and digital technology (ICIDDT). Zhenjing, China. [DOI:10.1109/ICIDDT52279.2020.00076]
179. Darkhani, F., Tahir, O. Mohd, Ibrahim, R. (2019). Sustainable urban landscape management: an insight into urban green space management practices in three different countries. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 12, 37-48. doi: 10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003. [DOI:10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003]
180. Deniz, B. Şirin, U. (2010). A study of ecological integrity based on native plants in kuşadasi (turkey) urban area and surrounding natural environment. Scientific research and essays 5, 1820-18. doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000111.
181. Gleason, K. L. (2019). The lost dimension: pruned plants in roman gardens. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 28(3), 311-325. doi:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2. [DOI:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2]
182. Goodness, J. (2018). Urban landscaping choices and people's selection of plant traits in cape town, south africa. Environmental Science & Policy, 85, 182-192. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.010]
184. Harp, D., Chretien, K., Brown, M., Jones, C., Lopez-Serrano, J. (2021). Landscape performance of ebony crepe myrtle cultivars in low-input landscapes in northcentral Texas. HortTechnology, 31(2), 234-240. [DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH04748-20]
185. Hilbert, D.A., Koeser, A.K., Northrop, R.J. (2020). Urban tree selection for diversity. EDIS, 5, 589-2020. [DOI:10.32473/edis-ep589-2020]
186. Hoyle, H., Norton, B., Dunnett, N., Richards, J. P., Russell, J. M., Warren, P. (2018). Plant species or flower colour diversity? identifying the drivers of public and invertebrate response to designed annual meadows. Landscape and urban planning, 180, 103-113. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.017]
188. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. in C.-L. Hwang & K. Yoon (Eds.), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey (pp. 58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
189. Ignatieva, M. (2021). Evolution of the Approaches to Planting Design of Parks and Gardens as Main Greenspaces of Green Infrastructure. In C. Catalano, M. B. Andreucci, R. Guarino, F. Bretzel, M. Leone, & S. Pasta (Eds.), Urban Services to Ecosystems: Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale (pp. 435-452). Cham: springer international publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_23]
190. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Ward Thompson, C. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 65-75. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001]
192. Jansson, M., Vogel, N., Fors, H., Randrup, T. B. (2019). The governance of landscape management new approaches to urban open space development. Landscape Research, 44(8), 952-965. doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199]
193. Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skřivanová, Z., Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents' characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 36-44. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009]
195. Kendal, D., Williams, K. J. H., Williams, N. S. G. (2012). Plant traits link people's plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1), 34-42. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023]
197. Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Hansen, G., Clem, T. (2020). Landscape aesthetics and maintenance perceptions: assessing the relationship between homeowners' visual attention and landscape care knowledge. Land Use Policy, 95, 104645. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104645]
199. Li, Z. (2020). Modularization of landscape architecture based on computer aided design involvement in aesthetics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574, 012089. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089]
200. Liu, M., Schroth, O. (2019). Assessment of Aesthetic preferences in relation to vegetation-created enclosure in Chinese urban parks: a case study of Shenzhen Litchi Park. Sustainability, 11(6). doi:10.3390/su11061809. [DOI:10.3390/su11061809]
201. Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J. V., Cormier, L., Madureira, T. (2015). Urban residents' beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 56-64. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008]
203. Majewska, A. A., Altizer, S. (2020). Planting gardens to support insect pollinators. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 15-25. doi: [DOI:10.1111/cobi.13271]
205. Mousadegh, A. A., Mahdavi, S. K., Mahmoudi, J. (2018). Using native species in urban landscape: Kordkuy city of Golestan province (a case study). Flower and Ornamental Plants, 2(2), 48-61 (in Persian).
206. Naroei, B., Yal, M. (2021). Evaluation of visual and aesthetic preferences of landscape in urban parks based on public preferences (A Case study of Sayad-e-Shirazi Park in Birjand). Human & Environment, 19(2), 201-219.
207. Nazemi Rafi, Z., Kazemi, F., Tehranifar, A. (2020). Public preferences toward water-wise landscape design in a summer season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126563. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126563]
209. Pan, X., Lin, Q. (2020). Simulation and optimization of the scenic beauty of green plants in the landscape design. Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics, Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15235-2_43]
210. Reis, C., Lopes, A. (2019). Evaluating the cooling potential of urban green spaces to tackle urban climate change in Lisbon. Sustainability, 11(9), 2480. doi:10.3390/su11092480. [DOI:10.3390/su11092480]
211. Riechers, M., Strack, M., Barkmann, J., Tscharntke, T. (2019). Cultural Ecosystem services provided by urban green change along an urban-periurban gradient. Sustainability, 11(3), 645. doi:10.3390/su11030645. [DOI:10.3390/su11030645]
212. Saaty, T. L. (1984). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments. in R. Avenhaus and R. K. Huber (eds.), Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control: Mathematical Modeling and Simulation in the Analysis of Arms Control Problems (pp. 285-308). Boston, MA: Springer us. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12]
213. Sedghiyan, D., Ashouri, A., Maftouni, N., Xiong, Q., Rezaee, E., Sadeghi, S. (2021). Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44, 101045. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101045]
215. Tabassum, S., Ossola, A., Manea, A., Cinantya, A., Fernandez Winzer, L., Leishman, M. R. (2020). Using ecological knowledge for landscaping with plants in cities. Ecological Engineering, 158, 106049. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106049]
217. Wang, B., Xie, H.-L., Ren, H.-Y., Li, X., Chen, L., Wu, B.-C. (2019). Application of AHP, TOPSIS, and TFNs to plant selection for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils in shale gas and oil fields. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 13-22. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.301]
219. Wang, L., Ali, Y., Nazir, S., Niazi, M. (2020). ISA Evaluation framework for security of Internet of health things system using AHP-TOPSIS methods. IEEE Access, 8, 152316-152332. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221]
220. Wang, R. (2021). Design of visual landscape garden environment of plant landscape based on CAD software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1992(2), 022159. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159]
221. Wang, R., Zhao, J. (2020). Effects of evergreen trees on landscape preference and perceived restorativeness across seasons. Landscape Research, 45(5), 649-661. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507]
222. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 6-13. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005]
224. Watson, A. S., Bai, R. S. (2021). Phytoremediation for urban landscaping and air pollution control- a case study in Trivandrum city, Kerala, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9979-9990. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1]
225. Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., Hu, B. (2018). Design intensities in relation to visual aesthetic preference. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 305-310. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.011]
227. Zare Zadeh, F., Karimian, A., Soudaie Zadeh, H. (2017). Effect of salt stress on some physiological attributes of Nerium oleander. Water and Soil Science, 27(3), 41-51.
228. Zhuang, J., Qiao, L., Zhang, X., Su, Y., Xia, Y. (2021). Effects of visual attributes of flower borders in urban vegetation landscapes on aesthetic preference and emotional perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9318. MDPI AG. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179318. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179318]



XML   English Abstract   Print



بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.
دوره 7، شماره 1 - ( بهار و تابستان 1401 ) برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها