[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims & Scope
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Indexing and Abstracting::
Reviewers::
Publication Ethics::
Copyright and Licensing::
Fees and Charges::
Open Access Statement::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 1 (Spring and Summer 2022) ::
FOP 2022, 7(1): 93-118 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of the aesthetic traits of ornamental shrubs in urban green space (Case study: region one of Rasht city)
Majid Shabanzadeh , Moazzam Hassanpour Asil * , Vahid Shadparvar
University of Guilan
Abstract:   (1779 Views)
Ornamental flowering shrubs have a special place in urban landscapes. Appropriate selection of these plants according to ecological and aesthetic criteria can help to improve and develop the performance of the urban landscape. A lot of research has been done on the selection of plants in green space. But less research has been done to examine the aesthetics of ornamental flowering shrubs. Identification and prioritization of ornamental flowering shrubs in region 1 of Rasht city is addressed in this research, according to experts’ evaluation. In this study, the combined approach of AHP-TOPSIS was used to prioritize the indices and rank the shrubs. The results of this study showed that Lagerstroemia indica has the first rank according to 10 indicators among 17 shrubs. Using the AHP-TOPSIS method is a good way to select a shrub. The findings of this research, based on identification of 10 indices and 17 shrubs, showed that among the indices, the landscape aesthetics index with a coefficient of 0.188 and flowering period with a coefficient of 0.185, ranked first and second, respectively. Also, shrub height index and branching with weights of 0.047 and 0.059 gained the last ranks. Among the shrubs, Lagerstroemia indica with a coefficient of 0.791 gained first rank, and Callistemon citrinus and Nerium oleander with coefficients of 0.732 and 0.722, gained second and third ranks in the green space of the Rasht city from the view of experts. Philadelphus coronaries and Spartium junceum with coefficients of 0.321 and 0.309, had the last ranks. Therefore, this method can be used to select plants in the urban landscape in similar regions.
Keywords: Aesthetic index, Landscape aesthetics, Green space, AHP-TOPSIS
Full-Text [PDF 1742 kb]   (402 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/01/6 | Accepted: 2022/04/22 | Published: 2022/10/15
References
1. Aalbers, C. B. E. M., Sehested, K. (2018). Critical upscaling. how citizens initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 29, 261-275. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.005]
3. Abbasi, Q. Azadbakht, M. Tajur, Y Akbarzadeh, M. (2014). Aesthetic evaluation of hyrcanian native tree plants (Case study: Sari city area). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 49(2), 515-527 (in Persian).
4. Alizadeh, B., Hitchmough, J. (2019). Areview of urban landscape adaptation to the challenge of climate change. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(2), 178-194. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179. [DOI:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179]
5. Aşur, F. (2019). Ornamental plants which can be used in visual landscape improvement in cold climate regions. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, 14(4), 152-159.
6. Chen, L., Wang, Y. (2020). Study on plant configuration and planning of landscape architecture in coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(SI), 17-20. doi:10.2112/jcr-si115-006.1. [DOI:10.2112/JCR-SI115-006.1]
7. Chenhui, X. (2020). Application of plant configuration method in modern landscape under the background of digital technology. paper presented at the 2020 International conference on Innovation design and digital technology (ICIDDT). Zhenjing, China. [DOI:10.1109/ICIDDT52279.2020.00076]
8. Darkhani, F., Tahir, O. Mohd, Ibrahim, R. (2019). Sustainable urban landscape management: an insight into urban green space management practices in three different countries. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 12, 37-48. doi: 10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003. [DOI:10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003]
9. Deniz, B. Şirin, U. (2010). A study of ecological integrity based on native plants in kuşadasi (turkey) urban area and surrounding natural environment. Scientific research and essays 5, 1820-18. doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000111.
10. Gleason, K. L. (2019). The lost dimension: pruned plants in roman gardens. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 28(3), 311-325. doi:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2. [DOI:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2]
11. Goodness, J. (2018). Urban landscaping choices and people's selection of plant traits in cape town, south africa. Environmental Science & Policy, 85, 182-192. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.010]
13. Harp, D., Chretien, K., Brown, M., Jones, C., Lopez-Serrano, J. (2021). Landscape performance of ebony crepe myrtle cultivars in low-input landscapes in northcentral Texas. HortTechnology, 31(2), 234-240. [DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH04748-20]
14. Hilbert, D.A., Koeser, A.K., Northrop, R.J. (2020). Urban tree selection for diversity. EDIS, 5, 589-2020. [DOI:10.32473/edis-ep589-2020]
15. Hoyle, H., Norton, B., Dunnett, N., Richards, J. P., Russell, J. M., Warren, P. (2018). Plant species or flower colour diversity? identifying the drivers of public and invertebrate response to designed annual meadows. Landscape and urban planning, 180, 103-113. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.017]
17. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. in C.-L. Hwang & K. Yoon (Eds.), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey (pp. 58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
18. Ignatieva, M. (2021). Evolution of the Approaches to Planting Design of Parks and Gardens as Main Greenspaces of Green Infrastructure. In C. Catalano, M. B. Andreucci, R. Guarino, F. Bretzel, M. Leone, & S. Pasta (Eds.), Urban Services to Ecosystems: Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale (pp. 435-452). Cham: springer international publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_23]
19. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Ward Thompson, C. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 65-75. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001]
21. Jansson, M., Vogel, N., Fors, H., Randrup, T. B. (2019). The governance of landscape management new approaches to urban open space development. Landscape Research, 44(8), 952-965. doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199]
22. Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skřivanová, Z., Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents' characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 36-44. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009]
24. Kendal, D., Williams, K. J. H., Williams, N. S. G. (2012). Plant traits link people's plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1), 34-42. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023]
26. Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Hansen, G., Clem, T. (2020). Landscape aesthetics and maintenance perceptions: assessing the relationship between homeowners' visual attention and landscape care knowledge. Land Use Policy, 95, 104645. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104645]
28. Li, Z. (2020). Modularization of landscape architecture based on computer aided design involvement in aesthetics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574, 012089. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089]
29. Liu, M., Schroth, O. (2019). Assessment of Aesthetic preferences in relation to vegetation-created enclosure in Chinese urban parks: a case study of Shenzhen Litchi Park. Sustainability, 11(6). doi:10.3390/su11061809. [DOI:10.3390/su11061809]
30. Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J. V., Cormier, L., Madureira, T. (2015). Urban residents' beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 56-64. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008]
32. Majewska, A. A., Altizer, S. (2020). Planting gardens to support insect pollinators. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 15-25. doi: [DOI:10.1111/cobi.13271]
34. Mousadegh, A. A., Mahdavi, S. K., Mahmoudi, J. (2018). Using native species in urban landscape: Kordkuy city of Golestan province (a case study). Flower and Ornamental Plants, 2(2), 48-61 (in Persian).
35. Naroei, B., Yal, M. (2021). Evaluation of visual and aesthetic preferences of landscape in urban parks based on public preferences (A Case study of Sayad-e-Shirazi Park in Birjand). Human & Environment, 19(2), 201-219.
36. Nazemi Rafi, Z., Kazemi, F., Tehranifar, A. (2020). Public preferences toward water-wise landscape design in a summer season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126563. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126563]
38. Pan, X., Lin, Q. (2020). Simulation and optimization of the scenic beauty of green plants in the landscape design. Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics, Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15235-2_43]
39. Reis, C., Lopes, A. (2019). Evaluating the cooling potential of urban green spaces to tackle urban climate change in Lisbon. Sustainability, 11(9), 2480. doi:10.3390/su11092480. [DOI:10.3390/su11092480]
40. Riechers, M., Strack, M., Barkmann, J., Tscharntke, T. (2019). Cultural Ecosystem services provided by urban green change along an urban-periurban gradient. Sustainability, 11(3), 645. doi:10.3390/su11030645. [DOI:10.3390/su11030645]
41. Saaty, T. L. (1984). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments. in R. Avenhaus and R. K. Huber (eds.), Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control: Mathematical Modeling and Simulation in the Analysis of Arms Control Problems (pp. 285-308). Boston, MA: Springer us. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12]
42. Sedghiyan, D., Ashouri, A., Maftouni, N., Xiong, Q., Rezaee, E., Sadeghi, S. (2021). Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44, 101045. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101045]
44. Tabassum, S., Ossola, A., Manea, A., Cinantya, A., Fernandez Winzer, L., Leishman, M. R. (2020). Using ecological knowledge for landscaping with plants in cities. Ecological Engineering, 158, 106049. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106049]
46. Wang, B., Xie, H.-L., Ren, H.-Y., Li, X., Chen, L., Wu, B.-C. (2019). Application of AHP, TOPSIS, and TFNs to plant selection for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils in shale gas and oil fields. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 13-22. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.301]
48. Wang, L., Ali, Y., Nazir, S., Niazi, M. (2020). ISA Evaluation framework for security of Internet of health things system using AHP-TOPSIS methods. IEEE Access, 8, 152316-152332. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221]
49. Wang, R. (2021). Design of visual landscape garden environment of plant landscape based on CAD software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1992(2), 022159. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159]
50. Wang, R., Zhao, J. (2020). Effects of evergreen trees on landscape preference and perceived restorativeness across seasons. Landscape Research, 45(5), 649-661. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507]
51. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 6-13. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005]
53. Watson, A. S., Bai, R. S. (2021). Phytoremediation for urban landscaping and air pollution control- a case study in Trivandrum city, Kerala, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9979-9990. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1]
54. Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., Hu, B. (2018). Design intensities in relation to visual aesthetic preference. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 305-310. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.011]
56. Zare Zadeh, F., Karimian, A., Soudaie Zadeh, H. (2017). Effect of salt stress on some physiological attributes of Nerium oleander. Water and Soil Science, 27(3), 41-51.
57. Zhuang, J., Qiao, L., Zhang, X., Su, Y., Xia, Y. (2021). Effects of visual attributes of flower borders in urban vegetation landscapes on aesthetic preference and emotional perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9318. MDPI AG. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179318. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179318]
58. Aalbers, C. B. E. M., Sehested, K. (2018). Critical upscaling. how citizens initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 29, 261-275. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.005]
60. Abbasi, Q. Azadbakht, M. Tajur, Y Akbarzadeh, M. (2014). Aesthetic evaluation of hyrcanian native tree plants (Case study: Sari city area). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 49(2), 515-527 (in Persian).
61. Alizadeh, B., Hitchmough, J. (2019). Areview of urban landscape adaptation to the challenge of climate change. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(2), 178-194. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179. [DOI:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179]
62. Aşur, F. (2019). Ornamental plants which can be used in visual landscape improvement in cold climate regions. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, 14(4), 152-159.
63. Chen, L., Wang, Y. (2020). Study on plant configuration and planning of landscape architecture in coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(SI), 17-20. doi:10.2112/jcr-si115-006.1. [DOI:10.2112/JCR-SI115-006.1]
64. Chenhui, X. (2020). Application of plant configuration method in modern landscape under the background of digital technology. paper presented at the 2020 International conference on Innovation design and digital technology (ICIDDT). Zhenjing, China. [DOI:10.1109/ICIDDT52279.2020.00076]
65. Darkhani, F., Tahir, O. Mohd, Ibrahim, R. (2019). Sustainable urban landscape management: an insight into urban green space management practices in three different countries. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 12, 37-48. doi: 10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003. [DOI:10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003]
66. Deniz, B. Şirin, U. (2010). A study of ecological integrity based on native plants in kuşadasi (turkey) urban area and surrounding natural environment. Scientific research and essays 5, 1820-18. doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000111.
67. Gleason, K. L. (2019). The lost dimension: pruned plants in roman gardens. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 28(3), 311-325. doi:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2. [DOI:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2]
68. Goodness, J. (2018). Urban landscaping choices and people's selection of plant traits in cape town, south africa. Environmental Science & Policy, 85, 182-192. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.010]
70. Harp, D., Chretien, K., Brown, M., Jones, C., Lopez-Serrano, J. (2021). Landscape performance of ebony crepe myrtle cultivars in low-input landscapes in northcentral Texas. HortTechnology, 31(2), 234-240. [DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH04748-20]
71. Hilbert, D.A., Koeser, A.K., Northrop, R.J. (2020). Urban tree selection for diversity. EDIS, 5, 589-2020. [DOI:10.32473/edis-ep589-2020]
72. Hoyle, H., Norton, B., Dunnett, N., Richards, J. P., Russell, J. M., Warren, P. (2018). Plant species or flower colour diversity? identifying the drivers of public and invertebrate response to designed annual meadows. Landscape and urban planning, 180, 103-113. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.017]
74. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. in C.-L. Hwang & K. Yoon (Eds.), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey (pp. 58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
75. Ignatieva, M. (2021). Evolution of the Approaches to Planting Design of Parks and Gardens as Main Greenspaces of Green Infrastructure. In C. Catalano, M. B. Andreucci, R. Guarino, F. Bretzel, M. Leone, & S. Pasta (Eds.), Urban Services to Ecosystems: Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale (pp. 435-452). Cham: springer international publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_23]
76. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Ward Thompson, C. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 65-75. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001]
78. Jansson, M., Vogel, N., Fors, H., Randrup, T. B. (2019). The governance of landscape management new approaches to urban open space development. Landscape Research, 44(8), 952-965. doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199]
79. Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skřivanová, Z., Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents' characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 36-44. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009]
81. Kendal, D., Williams, K. J. H., Williams, N. S. G. (2012). Plant traits link people's plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1), 34-42. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023]
83. Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Hansen, G., Clem, T. (2020). Landscape aesthetics and maintenance perceptions: assessing the relationship between homeowners' visual attention and landscape care knowledge. Land Use Policy, 95, 104645. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104645]
85. Li, Z. (2020). Modularization of landscape architecture based on computer aided design involvement in aesthetics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574, 012089. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089]
86. Liu, M., Schroth, O. (2019). Assessment of Aesthetic preferences in relation to vegetation-created enclosure in Chinese urban parks: a case study of Shenzhen Litchi Park. Sustainability, 11(6). doi:10.3390/su11061809. [DOI:10.3390/su11061809]
87. Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J. V., Cormier, L., Madureira, T. (2015). Urban residents' beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 56-64. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008]
89. Majewska, A. A., Altizer, S. (2020). Planting gardens to support insect pollinators. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 15-25. doi: [DOI:10.1111/cobi.13271]
91. Mousadegh, A. A., Mahdavi, S. K., Mahmoudi, J. (2018). Using native species in urban landscape: Kordkuy city of Golestan province (a case study). Flower and Ornamental Plants, 2(2), 48-61 (in Persian).
92. Naroei, B., Yal, M. (2021). Evaluation of visual and aesthetic preferences of landscape in urban parks based on public preferences (A Case study of Sayad-e-Shirazi Park in Birjand). Human & Environment, 19(2), 201-219.
93. Nazemi Rafi, Z., Kazemi, F., Tehranifar, A. (2020). Public preferences toward water-wise landscape design in a summer season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126563. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126563]
95. Pan, X., Lin, Q. (2020). Simulation and optimization of the scenic beauty of green plants in the landscape design. Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics, Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15235-2_43]
96. Reis, C., Lopes, A. (2019). Evaluating the cooling potential of urban green spaces to tackle urban climate change in Lisbon. Sustainability, 11(9), 2480. doi:10.3390/su11092480. [DOI:10.3390/su11092480]
97. Riechers, M., Strack, M., Barkmann, J., Tscharntke, T. (2019). Cultural Ecosystem services provided by urban green change along an urban-periurban gradient. Sustainability, 11(3), 645. doi:10.3390/su11030645. [DOI:10.3390/su11030645]
98. Saaty, T. L. (1984). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments. in R. Avenhaus and R. K. Huber (eds.), Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control: Mathematical Modeling and Simulation in the Analysis of Arms Control Problems (pp. 285-308). Boston, MA: Springer us. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12]
99. Sedghiyan, D., Ashouri, A., Maftouni, N., Xiong, Q., Rezaee, E., Sadeghi, S. (2021). Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44, 101045. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101045]
101. Tabassum, S., Ossola, A., Manea, A., Cinantya, A., Fernandez Winzer, L., Leishman, M. R. (2020). Using ecological knowledge for landscaping with plants in cities. Ecological Engineering, 158, 106049. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106049]
103. Wang, B., Xie, H.-L., Ren, H.-Y., Li, X., Chen, L., Wu, B.-C. (2019). Application of AHP, TOPSIS, and TFNs to plant selection for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils in shale gas and oil fields. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 13-22. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.301]
105. Wang, L., Ali, Y., Nazir, S., Niazi, M. (2020). ISA Evaluation framework for security of Internet of health things system using AHP-TOPSIS methods. IEEE Access, 8, 152316-152332. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221]
106. Wang, R. (2021). Design of visual landscape garden environment of plant landscape based on CAD software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1992(2), 022159. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159]
107. Wang, R., Zhao, J. (2020). Effects of evergreen trees on landscape preference and perceived restorativeness across seasons. Landscape Research, 45(5), 649-661. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507]
108. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 6-13. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005]
110. Watson, A. S., Bai, R. S. (2021). Phytoremediation for urban landscaping and air pollution control- a case study in Trivandrum city, Kerala, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9979-9990. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1]
111. Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., Hu, B. (2018). Design intensities in relation to visual aesthetic preference. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 305-310. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.011]
113. Zare Zadeh, F., Karimian, A., Soudaie Zadeh, H. (2017). Effect of salt stress on some physiological attributes of Nerium oleander. Water and Soil Science, 27(3), 41-51.
114. Zhuang, J., Qiao, L., Zhang, X., Su, Y., Xia, Y. (2021). Effects of visual attributes of flower borders in urban vegetation landscapes on aesthetic preference and emotional perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9318. MDPI AG. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179318. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179318]
115. Aalbers, C. B. E. M., Sehested, K. (2018). Critical upscaling. how citizens initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 29, 261-275. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.005]
117. Abbasi, Q. Azadbakht, M. Tajur, Y Akbarzadeh, M. (2014). Aesthetic evaluation of hyrcanian native tree plants (Case study: Sari city area). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 49(2), 515-527 (in Persian).
118. Alizadeh, B., Hitchmough, J. (2019). Areview of urban landscape adaptation to the challenge of climate change. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(2), 178-194. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179. [DOI:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179]
119. Aşur, F. (2019). Ornamental plants which can be used in visual landscape improvement in cold climate regions. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, 14(4), 152-159.
120. Chen, L., Wang, Y. (2020). Study on plant configuration and planning of landscape architecture in coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(SI), 17-20. doi:10.2112/jcr-si115-006.1. [DOI:10.2112/JCR-SI115-006.1]
121. Chenhui, X. (2020). Application of plant configuration method in modern landscape under the background of digital technology. paper presented at the 2020 International conference on Innovation design and digital technology (ICIDDT). Zhenjing, China. [DOI:10.1109/ICIDDT52279.2020.00076]
122. Darkhani, F., Tahir, O. Mohd, Ibrahim, R. (2019). Sustainable urban landscape management: an insight into urban green space management practices in three different countries. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 12, 37-48. doi: 10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003. [DOI:10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003]
123. Deniz, B. Şirin, U. (2010). A study of ecological integrity based on native plants in kuşadasi (turkey) urban area and surrounding natural environment. Scientific research and essays 5, 1820-18. doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000111.
124. Gleason, K. L. (2019). The lost dimension: pruned plants in roman gardens. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 28(3), 311-325. doi:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2. [DOI:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2]
125. Goodness, J. (2018). Urban landscaping choices and people's selection of plant traits in cape town, south africa. Environmental Science & Policy, 85, 182-192. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.010]
127. Harp, D., Chretien, K., Brown, M., Jones, C., Lopez-Serrano, J. (2021). Landscape performance of ebony crepe myrtle cultivars in low-input landscapes in northcentral Texas. HortTechnology, 31(2), 234-240. [DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH04748-20]
128. Hilbert, D.A., Koeser, A.K., Northrop, R.J. (2020). Urban tree selection for diversity. EDIS, 5, 589-2020. [DOI:10.32473/edis-ep589-2020]
129. Hoyle, H., Norton, B., Dunnett, N., Richards, J. P., Russell, J. M., Warren, P. (2018). Plant species or flower colour diversity? identifying the drivers of public and invertebrate response to designed annual meadows. Landscape and urban planning, 180, 103-113. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.017]
131. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. in C.-L. Hwang & K. Yoon (Eds.), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey (pp. 58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
132. Ignatieva, M. (2021). Evolution of the Approaches to Planting Design of Parks and Gardens as Main Greenspaces of Green Infrastructure. In C. Catalano, M. B. Andreucci, R. Guarino, F. Bretzel, M. Leone, & S. Pasta (Eds.), Urban Services to Ecosystems: Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale (pp. 435-452). Cham: springer international publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_23]
133. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Ward Thompson, C. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 65-75. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001]
135. Jansson, M., Vogel, N., Fors, H., Randrup, T. B. (2019). The governance of landscape management new approaches to urban open space development. Landscape Research, 44(8), 952-965. doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199]
136. Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skřivanová, Z., Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents' characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 36-44. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009]
138. Kendal, D., Williams, K. J. H., Williams, N. S. G. (2012). Plant traits link people's plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1), 34-42. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023]
140. Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Hansen, G., Clem, T. (2020). Landscape aesthetics and maintenance perceptions: assessing the relationship between homeowners' visual attention and landscape care knowledge. Land Use Policy, 95, 104645. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104645]
142. Li, Z. (2020). Modularization of landscape architecture based on computer aided design involvement in aesthetics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574, 012089. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089]
143. Liu, M., Schroth, O. (2019). Assessment of Aesthetic preferences in relation to vegetation-created enclosure in Chinese urban parks: a case study of Shenzhen Litchi Park. Sustainability, 11(6). doi:10.3390/su11061809. [DOI:10.3390/su11061809]
144. Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J. V., Cormier, L., Madureira, T. (2015). Urban residents' beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 56-64. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008]
146. Majewska, A. A., Altizer, S. (2020). Planting gardens to support insect pollinators. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 15-25. doi: [DOI:10.1111/cobi.13271]
148. Mousadegh, A. A., Mahdavi, S. K., Mahmoudi, J. (2018). Using native species in urban landscape: Kordkuy city of Golestan province (a case study). Flower and Ornamental Plants, 2(2), 48-61 (in Persian).
149. Naroei, B., Yal, M. (2021). Evaluation of visual and aesthetic preferences of landscape in urban parks based on public preferences (A Case study of Sayad-e-Shirazi Park in Birjand). Human & Environment, 19(2), 201-219.
150. Nazemi Rafi, Z., Kazemi, F., Tehranifar, A. (2020). Public preferences toward water-wise landscape design in a summer season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126563. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126563]
152. Pan, X., Lin, Q. (2020). Simulation and optimization of the scenic beauty of green plants in the landscape design. Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics, Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15235-2_43]
153. Reis, C., Lopes, A. (2019). Evaluating the cooling potential of urban green spaces to tackle urban climate change in Lisbon. Sustainability, 11(9), 2480. doi:10.3390/su11092480. [DOI:10.3390/su11092480]
154. Riechers, M., Strack, M., Barkmann, J., Tscharntke, T. (2019). Cultural Ecosystem services provided by urban green change along an urban-periurban gradient. Sustainability, 11(3), 645. doi:10.3390/su11030645. [DOI:10.3390/su11030645]
155. Saaty, T. L. (1984). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments. in R. Avenhaus and R. K. Huber (eds.), Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control: Mathematical Modeling and Simulation in the Analysis of Arms Control Problems (pp. 285-308). Boston, MA: Springer us. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12]
156. Sedghiyan, D., Ashouri, A., Maftouni, N., Xiong, Q., Rezaee, E., Sadeghi, S. (2021). Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44, 101045. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101045]
158. Tabassum, S., Ossola, A., Manea, A., Cinantya, A., Fernandez Winzer, L., Leishman, M. R. (2020). Using ecological knowledge for landscaping with plants in cities. Ecological Engineering, 158, 106049. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106049]
160. Wang, B., Xie, H.-L., Ren, H.-Y., Li, X., Chen, L., Wu, B.-C. (2019). Application of AHP, TOPSIS, and TFNs to plant selection for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils in shale gas and oil fields. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 13-22. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.301]
162. Wang, L., Ali, Y., Nazir, S., Niazi, M. (2020). ISA Evaluation framework for security of Internet of health things system using AHP-TOPSIS methods. IEEE Access, 8, 152316-152332. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221]
163. Wang, R. (2021). Design of visual landscape garden environment of plant landscape based on CAD software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1992(2), 022159. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159]
164. Wang, R., Zhao, J. (2020). Effects of evergreen trees on landscape preference and perceived restorativeness across seasons. Landscape Research, 45(5), 649-661. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507]
165. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 6-13. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005]
167. Watson, A. S., Bai, R. S. (2021). Phytoremediation for urban landscaping and air pollution control- a case study in Trivandrum city, Kerala, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9979-9990. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1]
168. Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., Hu, B. (2018). Design intensities in relation to visual aesthetic preference. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 305-310. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.011]
170. Zare Zadeh, F., Karimian, A., Soudaie Zadeh, H. (2017). Effect of salt stress on some physiological attributes of Nerium oleander. Water and Soil Science, 27(3), 41-51.
171. Zhuang, J., Qiao, L., Zhang, X., Su, Y., Xia, Y. (2021). Effects of visual attributes of flower borders in urban vegetation landscapes on aesthetic preference and emotional perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9318. MDPI AG. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179318. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179318]
172. Aalbers, C. B. E. M., Sehested, K. (2018). Critical upscaling. how citizens initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 29, 261-275. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.005]
174. Abbasi, Q. Azadbakht, M. Tajur, Y Akbarzadeh, M. (2014). Aesthetic evaluation of hyrcanian native tree plants (Case study: Sari city area). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 49(2), 515-527 (in Persian).
175. Alizadeh, B., Hitchmough, J. (2019). Areview of urban landscape adaptation to the challenge of climate change. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(2), 178-194. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179. [DOI:10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0179]
176. Aşur, F. (2019). Ornamental plants which can be used in visual landscape improvement in cold climate regions. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, 14(4), 152-159.
177. Chen, L., Wang, Y. (2020). Study on plant configuration and planning of landscape architecture in coastal cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 115(SI), 17-20. doi:10.2112/jcr-si115-006.1. [DOI:10.2112/JCR-SI115-006.1]
178. Chenhui, X. (2020). Application of plant configuration method in modern landscape under the background of digital technology. paper presented at the 2020 International conference on Innovation design and digital technology (ICIDDT). Zhenjing, China. [DOI:10.1109/ICIDDT52279.2020.00076]
179. Darkhani, F., Tahir, O. Mohd, Ibrahim, R. (2019). Sustainable urban landscape management: an insight into urban green space management practices in three different countries. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 12, 37-48. doi: 10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003. [DOI:10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003]
180. Deniz, B. Şirin, U. (2010). A study of ecological integrity based on native plants in kuşadasi (turkey) urban area and surrounding natural environment. Scientific research and essays 5, 1820-18. doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000111.
181. Gleason, K. L. (2019). The lost dimension: pruned plants in roman gardens. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 28(3), 311-325. doi:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2. [DOI:10.1007/s00334-019-00729-2]
182. Goodness, J. (2018). Urban landscaping choices and people's selection of plant traits in cape town, south africa. Environmental Science & Policy, 85, 182-192. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.010]
184. Harp, D., Chretien, K., Brown, M., Jones, C., Lopez-Serrano, J. (2021). Landscape performance of ebony crepe myrtle cultivars in low-input landscapes in northcentral Texas. HortTechnology, 31(2), 234-240. [DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH04748-20]
185. Hilbert, D.A., Koeser, A.K., Northrop, R.J. (2020). Urban tree selection for diversity. EDIS, 5, 589-2020. [DOI:10.32473/edis-ep589-2020]
186. Hoyle, H., Norton, B., Dunnett, N., Richards, J. P., Russell, J. M., Warren, P. (2018). Plant species or flower colour diversity? identifying the drivers of public and invertebrate response to designed annual meadows. Landscape and urban planning, 180, 103-113. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.017]
188. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. in C.-L. Hwang & K. Yoon (Eds.), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey (pp. 58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
189. Ignatieva, M. (2021). Evolution of the Approaches to Planting Design of Parks and Gardens as Main Greenspaces of Green Infrastructure. In C. Catalano, M. B. Andreucci, R. Guarino, F. Bretzel, M. Leone, & S. Pasta (Eds.), Urban Services to Ecosystems: Green Infrastructure Benefits from the Landscape to the Urban Scale (pp. 435-452). Cham: springer international publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-75929-2_23]
190. James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J., Ward Thompson, C. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(2), 65-75. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001]
192. Jansson, M., Vogel, N., Fors, H., Randrup, T. B. (2019). The governance of landscape management new approaches to urban open space development. Landscape Research, 44(8), 952-965. doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2018.1536199]
193. Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skřivanová, Z., Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents' characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 36-44. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009]
195. Kendal, D., Williams, K. J. H., Williams, N. S. G. (2012). Plant traits link people's plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1), 34-42. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023]
197. Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Hansen, G., Clem, T. (2020). Landscape aesthetics and maintenance perceptions: assessing the relationship between homeowners' visual attention and landscape care knowledge. Land Use Policy, 95, 104645. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104645]
199. Li, Z. (2020). Modularization of landscape architecture based on computer aided design involvement in aesthetics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574, 012089. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012089]
200. Liu, M., Schroth, O. (2019). Assessment of Aesthetic preferences in relation to vegetation-created enclosure in Chinese urban parks: a case study of Shenzhen Litchi Park. Sustainability, 11(6). doi:10.3390/su11061809. [DOI:10.3390/su11061809]
201. Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J. V., Cormier, L., Madureira, T. (2015). Urban residents' beliefs concerning green space benefits in four cities in France and Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1), 56-64. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008]
203. Majewska, A. A., Altizer, S. (2020). Planting gardens to support insect pollinators. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 15-25. doi: [DOI:10.1111/cobi.13271]
205. Mousadegh, A. A., Mahdavi, S. K., Mahmoudi, J. (2018). Using native species in urban landscape: Kordkuy city of Golestan province (a case study). Flower and Ornamental Plants, 2(2), 48-61 (in Persian).
206. Naroei, B., Yal, M. (2021). Evaluation of visual and aesthetic preferences of landscape in urban parks based on public preferences (A Case study of Sayad-e-Shirazi Park in Birjand). Human & Environment, 19(2), 201-219.
207. Nazemi Rafi, Z., Kazemi, F., Tehranifar, A. (2020). Public preferences toward water-wise landscape design in a summer season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126563. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126563]
209. Pan, X., Lin, Q. (2020). Simulation and optimization of the scenic beauty of green plants in the landscape design. Cyber Security Intelligence and Analytics, Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15235-2_43]
210. Reis, C., Lopes, A. (2019). Evaluating the cooling potential of urban green spaces to tackle urban climate change in Lisbon. Sustainability, 11(9), 2480. doi:10.3390/su11092480. [DOI:10.3390/su11092480]
211. Riechers, M., Strack, M., Barkmann, J., Tscharntke, T. (2019). Cultural Ecosystem services provided by urban green change along an urban-periurban gradient. Sustainability, 11(3), 645. doi:10.3390/su11030645. [DOI:10.3390/su11030645]
212. Saaty, T. L. (1984). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments. in R. Avenhaus and R. K. Huber (eds.), Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control: Mathematical Modeling and Simulation in the Analysis of Arms Control Problems (pp. 285-308). Boston, MA: Springer us. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12]
213. Sedghiyan, D., Ashouri, A., Maftouni, N., Xiong, Q., Rezaee, E., Sadeghi, S. (2021). Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 44, 101045. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101045]
215. Tabassum, S., Ossola, A., Manea, A., Cinantya, A., Fernandez Winzer, L., Leishman, M. R. (2020). Using ecological knowledge for landscaping with plants in cities. Ecological Engineering, 158, 106049. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106049]
217. Wang, B., Xie, H.-L., Ren, H.-Y., Li, X., Chen, L., Wu, B.-C. (2019). Application of AHP, TOPSIS, and TFNs to plant selection for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils in shale gas and oil fields. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 13-22. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.301]
219. Wang, L., Ali, Y., Nazir, S., Niazi, M. (2020). ISA Evaluation framework for security of Internet of health things system using AHP-TOPSIS methods. IEEE Access, 8, 152316-152332. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221]
220. Wang, R. (2021). Design of visual landscape garden environment of plant landscape based on CAD software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1992(2), 022159. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1992/2/022159]
221. Wang, R., Zhao, J. (2020). Effects of evergreen trees on landscape preference and perceived restorativeness across seasons. Landscape Research, 45(5), 649-661. doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507. [DOI:10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507]
222. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 6-13. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005]
224. Watson, A. S., Bai, R. S. (2021). Phytoremediation for urban landscaping and air pollution control- a case study in Trivandrum city, Kerala, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(8), 9979-9990. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-11131-1]
225. Xu, W., Zhao, J., Huang, Y., Hu, B. (2018). Design intensities in relation to visual aesthetic preference. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 305-310. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.011]
227. Zare Zadeh, F., Karimian, A., Soudaie Zadeh, H. (2017). Effect of salt stress on some physiological attributes of Nerium oleander. Water and Soil Science, 27(3), 41-51.
228. Zhuang, J., Qiao, L., Zhang, X., Su, Y., Xia, Y. (2021). Effects of visual attributes of flower borders in urban vegetation landscapes on aesthetic preference and emotional perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9318. MDPI AG. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179318. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179318]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shabanzadeh M, Hassanpour Asil M, Shadparvar V. Evaluation of the aesthetic traits of ornamental shrubs in urban green space (Case study: region one of Rasht city). FOP 2022; 7 (1) :93-118
URL: http://flowerjournal.ir/article-1-217-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 1 (Spring and Summer 2022) Back to browse issues page
گل و گیاهان زینتی Flower and Ornamental Plants
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660